< ciso
brief />
Tag Banner

All news with #improper certificate validation tag

6 articles

ABB Automation Studio Certificate Validation Vulnerability

πŸ”’ ABB has released an update for Automation Studio to address an improper certificate validation vulnerability affecting the OPC-UA and ANSL over TLS clients (CVE-2025-11043). An attacker with network access who can intercept or redirect communications could present forged certificates that pass validation, enabling interception or manipulation of data. The issue is fixed in Automation Studio 6.5; users should apply the update promptly and follow recommended network segmentation and secure remote-access practices. CISA rates this flaw as High (CVSS 7.4) and recorded no reports of active exploitation at publication.
read more β†’

Siemens Analytics Toolkit: Certificate Validation Flaw

πŸ”’ Multiple Siemens analytics applications are affected by improper certificate validation in the Siemens Analytics Toolkit, which could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to conduct man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks. Affected products include Siemens Software Center, Simcenter 3D, Simcenter Femap, Simcenter STAR-CCM+, Solid Edge, and Tecnomatix Plant Simulation. Siemens has released vendor fixes; CISA and Siemens recommend applying the updates immediately, minimizing network exposure, and following operational security guidance to isolate control system networks and secure remote access.
read more β†’

Critical wolfSSL vulnerability allows forged certificates

πŸ”’ A critical vulnerability in the wolfSSL TLS/SSL library (tracked as CVE-2026-5194) permits improper verification of hash algorithms and sizes when validating ECDSA and other signatures. Researchers warn attackers can present forged certificates with undersized digests that vulnerable implementations will accept, enabling impersonation of servers, files, or connections. Discovered by Nicholas Carlini of Anthropic, the issue was fixed in wolfSSL 5.9.1 (April 8); administrators should review deployments and apply updates or vendor patches promptly.
read more β†’

Siemens SALT TLS Certificate Validation Vulnerability

πŸ”’The Siemens SALT SDK used by multiple engineering and simulation products fails to validate server TLS certificates, creating a risk of man-in-the-middle attacks by unauthenticated remote actors. Assigned CVE-2025-40801 with a CVSS v4 base score of 9.2, the issue affects COMOS, NX, Simcenter, Tecnomatix and others. Siemens has published updates for some versions while several products currently have no available fix; affected systems should be isolated, patched where possible, and protected behind properly configured firewalls and secure remote access solutions.
read more β†’

Siemens IAM Client TLS Certificate Validation Flaw

⚠️ The Siemens IAM client used across several engineering products contains an improper certificate validation flaw (CVE-2025-40800) that can enable unauthenticated remote man-in-the-middle attacks. CISA lists a CVSS v4 score of 9.1, indicating severe impact and remote exploitability, and also reports a CVSS v3.1 score of 7.4. Affected products include COMOS V10.6, NX (pre-2412.8700 / pre-2506.6000), Simcenter 3D, Simcenter Femap, and Solid Edge SE2025/SE2026; Siemens has issued patched versions for most items, though COMOS V10.6 currently has no fix. CISA and Siemens recommend applying available updates, isolating control networks, and minimizing direct internet exposure.
read more β†’

Siemens Solid Edge: Improper Certificate Validation

⚠️ Siemens disclosed an improper certificate validation vulnerability in Solid Edge SE2025 that could enable unauthenticated remote man-in-the-middle attacks against the product's license service connections. The issue is tracked as CVE-2025-40744 and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 and a CVSS v4 base score of 8.7, indicating high impact and low attack complexity. Siemens recommends updating to V225.0 Update 11 or later and restricting network access to licensing endpoints; CISA also advises network segmentation, use of secure remote access, and standard anti-phishing protections. No known public exploitation targeting this vulnerability has been reported.
read more β†’