All news with #zero trust tag

🔒 CERT-In has issued a 38‑page blueprint urging organisations to remediate known exploited, internet‑facing critical vulnerabilities within 12 hours where feasible to counter AI‑assisted automation of vulnerability discovery and exploitation. The guidance emphasizes continuous, risk‑based vulnerability and patch management, Zero Trust, defence‑in‑depth, supply chain scrutiny, and secure‑by‑design practices. It also prescribes tiered remediation timeframes for critical and high‑severity flaws and recommends temporary mitigations when patches are unavailable.

🛡️ This article highlights how St. Luke’s University Health Network and ManpowerGroup modernized security to enable AI-powered operations. It describes how both organizations unified visibility across cloud, identity, endpoint, and email by adopting Microsoft Security Copilot, Microsoft Defender, and Microsoft Sentinel, and how automation reduced noise and accelerated response. The piece frames security as a strategic enabler for scaling AI responsibly under Zero Trust and governance principles.

🔐 Modern breaches increasingly exploit identities rather than perimeter flaws. Cloud, SaaS, and hybrid work have dissolved traditional network borders so attackers favor stolen credentials, session token replay and OAuth consent phishing. MFA and perimeter controls remain important but can be bypassed through social engineering, proxying and misconfigured privileges. Organizations must elevate identity monitoring, enforce least privilege and realign investments toward identity governance and contextual access controls.

🔧 Cisco Talos argues that rapid advances in AI-driven code analysis will soon expose decades of latent software defects, triggering a likely surge in vulnerability disclosures and urgent patches. While AI can augment human reviewers by scanning code at scale, threat actors will also use these tools to find exploits. Organizations should reassess patch prioritization, scale deployment processes, and plan for systems that cannot be quickly patched. Talos recommends zero trust, centralized logging, PowerShell script block logging, and updated incident response playbooks.

🔒 The 2026 CSO Awards recognize 64 security organizations whose projects deliver measurable business value and stronger enterprise resilience. CSO profiles six standout initiatives that illustrate trends such as zero trust, AI-driven automation, gamified awareness, and shift-left cloud security. Examples include Copart’s adaptive phishing and gamification that lifted reporting rates from ~20% to over 55%, HMSA’s Zero Trust Data Governance that removed confidential member information from nonproduction environments, and Hensel Phelps’ automation program saving more than 1,250 work hours annually.

🔒 Most organizations assume assets inside their trust boundary are trustworthy, but state-sponsored actors deliberately exploit that assumption by operating through legitimate tooling and valid credentials. These adversaries are patient, disciplined, and often pursue espionage or long-term data extraction rather than noisy disruption, making standard playbooks inadequate. Adopting zero trust, continuous baselining across identity, endpoints, network, and cloud, and expanding detection beyond host telemetry are essential. Preparation must include robust logging, privileged access controls, legal and government coordination, and tailored playbooks for supply chain, insider, and OT scenarios.

🔒 Knostic’s internet-wide reconnaissance discovered 1,862 exposed MCP servers, and manual checks of 119 instances showed every sampled server returned internal tool listings without authentication. High-impact flaws like EchoLeak (CVE-2025-32711) and mcp-remote (CVE-2025-6514) illustrate how poisoned documents and command-injection in widely used packages can enable silent data exfiltration or full system compromise. The article prescribes immediate adoption of zero-trust controls: authentication on every interaction, network segmentation, cryptographic signing for tool definitions, continuous integrity monitoring, and human approval for sensitive actions.

🔧 IAM Policy Autopilot now analyzes Java applications and cross-references Terraform definitions to produce more precise IAM policies. The open-source tool, introduced at re:Invent 2025, already supported Python, TypeScript, and Go, and is available at no additional cost for local use. By resolving resource ARNs from Terraform, generated policies can avoid broad wildcard permissions and better enforce least-privilege. This update speeds policy creation and reduces time spent troubleshooting access issues.

🔒This webinar delivers a practical, technical playbook for identifying and neutralizing a corporate 'Patient Zero'—the first compromised device that enables rapid lateral movement. Speakers will unpack how generative AI enables stealthy phishing, the critical five-minute window, and how Zero Trust isolation halts spread. Attendees gain an actionable Recovery Blueprint to contain, remediate, and restore systems.

🔐 Google Cloud announced IAM enhancements at Next '26 to secure agentic AI with Agent Identity and an Agent Gateway. Agent Identity, built on the open SPIFFE standard, provides cryptographically verifiable, automatically provisioned identities and new OAuth/certificate tooling. The Agent Gateway, Identity‑Aware Proxy, and Context‑Aware Access extend Zero Trust to agent traffic, while policy updates, guardrails, and Model Armor add runtime defenses.

🔒 CISA has launched CI Fortify, urging water, energy, transportation and communications operators to plan to disconnect from third-party networks and maintain essential services if targeted by cyber-attacks. The guidance sets two core objectives: isolation — proactively segmenting OT from business and upstream networks to keep services running in degraded communications — and recovery — documenting systems, backing up critical files and rehearsing component replacement or manual operation. Operators are advised to identify critical customers, set service targets, update continuity plans for prolonged isolation, and share the guidance with vendors, integrators and managed service providers.

🛡️Organizations commonly implement strong identity, authentication and access policies under a zero-trust strategy, yet enforcement at the network traffic layer is frequently inconsistent. Gaps appear across ingress paths, load balancers, CDNs, TLS termination and east–west service communication, allowing traffic to bypass identity controls. Successful programs treat the traffic plane as the primary enforcement point: standardizing ingress, enforcing strict TLS baselines and mTLS, normalizing requests and maintaining end-to-end telemetry. The core message: mindset and policy alone are insufficient without consistent traffic-layer enforcement.

🔒 A joint guide from CISA and federal partners outlines how to adapt zero trust principles to operational technology (OT) environments while preserving safety and uptime. It details practical measures such as passive asset discovery, network segmentation, microsegmentation, identity and access controls tailored to legacy devices, and secure remote access via jump hosts with MFA. The guidance calls out risks from IT/OT convergence, including credential compromise, supply-chain vulnerabilities and malware that can disrupt physical processes. It emphasizes compensating controls where modern security features cannot be deployed, and the need for close IT–OT collaboration and integrated incident response.

🔒 CISA has instructed owners and operators of operational technology to stop assuming network safety and released joint guidance, Adapting Zero Trust Principles to Operational Technology, to apply Zero Trust to systems supporting power, water, transportation, building automation, and weapons-support infrastructure. The 28-page guide — developed with the Department of War, Department of Energy, FBI, State Department and NIST technical input — emphasizes assuming adversaries are inside, validating access by identity, context, and risk, and tailoring controls to OT constraints like latency and safety.

🔐 CISA and U.S. government partners published Adapting Zero Trust Principles to Operational Technology, a practical guide for OT owners, operators, and Zero Trust practitioners. The guidance explains how to apply Zero Trust in OT environments while minimizing risk to mission-critical systems and accommodating legacy constraints and safety requirements. It highlights establishing zones and conduits, addressing supply chain risks, and implementing robust identity and access management to reduce exposure and strengthen resilience.

🔒 CISA, in coordination with the Department of War, Department of Energy, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Department of State, published joint guidance on applying Zero Trust principles to operational technology. The guidance addresses IT-OT convergence risks, legacy infrastructure limitations, operational and safety constraints, and recommends layered controls such as asset visibility, identity and access management, network segmentation, secure communication protocols, and vulnerability management. It emphasizes continuous validation of access and proactive supply chain risk management to protect critical physical processes.

🔒 New Cyber360 research shows the overlooked Zero Trust gap is not identity or endpoints but the movement of data across boundaries. The survey of 500 government, defense, and critical services leaders found 84% see cross-network data sharing as a heightened cyber risk and 53% still use manual transfer processes. That mismatch creates an attack surface as AI accelerates operations; layered approaches combining Zero Trust, data-centric controls, and cross-domain technologies are recommended for secure, near-real-time sharing.

🔒Attackers are increasingly hijacking legitimate AI agents and compromised credentials to extract sensitive information, turning in-house assistants into active threats. These agents become 'agentic endpoints'—autonomous identities with broad privileges that often evade traditional controls by using plugins, extensions, and stolen API tokens. Organizations need a consolidated security platform, continuous verification through PAM and Zero Trust, and board-level governance to manage this accelerated, AI-driven risk.

🚀 Google Cloud at Next '26 introduced a cross-cloud infrastructure blueprint designed for the agentic AI era, combining fluid compute, secure cross-cloud connectivity, a unified data layer, and digital sovereignty. Announcements include new CPU families (C4N, M4N with Hyperdisk Extreme), GKE Agent Sandbox, Agent Gateway, Smart Storage, Knowledge Catalog, and Confidential External Key Management to enable high-performance, governed agent workflows across clouds and on-premises. The updates target enterprises and public sector organizations preparing for machine-speed AI operations.

🔐 Identity-centric systems have evolved from simple login mechanisms into the operational backbone of digital enterprises. By replacing the old network perimeter with a person- and device-centric model, modern identity frameworks enable fine-grained access control, real-time authorization and auditable accountability across cloud, mobile and distributed workforces. They also power customer personalization and fraud detection, helping teams move faster while reducing operational and security risk.